2024 Exxon shipping co v baker

Exxon shipping co v baker

Author: oqej

August undefined, 2024

WebThe owner, petitioner Exxon Shipping Co. (now SeaRiver Maritime, Inc.), and its owner, petitioner Exxon Mobil Corp. (collectively, Exxon), have settled state and federal claims for environmental damage, with payments exceeding $1 billion, and this action by respondent Baker and others, including commercial fishermen and native Alaskans, was ... WebMar 1, 2010 · livelihoods (Exxon Shipping Co. v. Baker, 128 S.Ct., p. 2611 (2008)). 4 On the night of the spill, Jo seph Hazelwood captained the 900 foot-long tanker loaded with over a million barrels of crude oil.

Exxon Shipping Co. v. Baker: The Supreme Court Tightens the …

WebExxon Valdez. litigation marathon—a protracted, two-decade-long battle over the propriety and constitutionality of the jury’s $5 billion punitive damages award—provides a window into the past, present, and future of punitive damages. Exxon Shipping Co. v. Baker. 1. provides an apt WebJan 17, 2024 · Exxon Shipping Company v. Baker et al. Oyez U.S. Supreme Court Media Project. The Oyez Project is a collection of U.S. Supreme Court Media. The case is outlined, similar to the style of the Legal Information Institute, but also summarized for easy consumption by readers. The Oyez site also offers court transcripts, and recorded oral … office of sustainability austin texas

Judge-Jury Difference in Punitive Damages Awards: Who …

WebExxon spent some $2.1 billion in cleanup efforts, pleaded guilty to criminal violations occasioning fines, settled a civil action by the United States and Alaska for at least $900 million, and paid another $303 million in voluntary payments to private parties. WebExxon Shipping Co. v. Baker, 554 U.S. 471 (2008) ..... 2, 24, 30 Federal Insurance Co. v. Keybank N.A., 340 Fed. App’x 5 (2d Cir. 2009) ..... 17 Fireman’s Fund Insurance Co. v. Great Ameri-can Insurance Co. of New York, 822 F.3d 620 WebFeb 27, 2008 · Exxon knew that Hazelwood had resumed drinking but did not relieve him of his post, and the ship eventually spilled 11 million gallons of oil into the ecologically sensitive sound. The jury calculated compensatory damages at $287 million, and then awarded $5 billion in punitive damages. office of sustainability tamu

There Are More Things to Punitive Damages in Admiralty Than …

Webthis as a serious “problem.” Exxon Shipping Co. v. Baker, 554 U.S. 471, 499 (2008). And there has been a wide range of damages awarded for unseaworthiness claims. Plus, the availability of punitive damages should not turn on whether a plaintiff pleads a common-law WebJun 18, 2024 · Exxon Shipping Co. v. Baker, 554 U.S. 471, 486 n.5 (2008) (citations and quotation marks omitted); accord United States v. Metro. St. Louis Sewer Dist., 440 F.3d 930, 933 (8th Cir. 2006) ("It should be noted that Rule 59(e) motions serve the limited function of correcting manifest errors of law or fact or to present newly discovered … my ctt portalWebFacts. This case stems from the infamous Exxon Valdez oil spill off the coast of Alaska. Plaintiffs living in Prince William Sound, the location of the spill, sued Exxon for consequential economic losses that resulted from the spill, as such plaintiffs depended on the Sound for their economic livelihood. Fault was found because the captain left ... my ct state

"WebJun 25, 2008 · EXXON SHIPPING CO. v. BAKER U.S. Supreme Court Jun 25, 2008 Subsequent References CaseIQ TM (AI Recommendations) EXXON SHIPPING CO. v. BAKER Important Paras Most of the rules under which Exxon sought relief are inapplicable on their face. See Fed. Rules Civ. Proc. 49 (a), 56 (b), (d), and 58 (2). " - Exxon shipping co v baker

Exxon shipping co v baker

In The Supreme Court of the United States

WebSupreme Court cases preceding Exxon Shipping Co. v. Baker at length, including BMW of North America, Inc. v. Gore,5 as well as State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Campbell.6 This Note argues against the imposition of a strict one-to-one maximum ratio of punitive-to-compensatory damages. In light of the varying application of Exxon

Did you know?

WebExxon Shipping Co. v. Baker - 554 U.S. 471, 128 S. Ct. 2605 (2008) Rule: A 1:1 ratio of compensatory-to-punitive damages is a fair upper limit in maritime tort cases. Facts: Oil spilled from a tanker. WebSummary. This amicus curiae brief argues against the defendant’s relevance of The Amiable Nancy as it applies to the case of Exxon Shipping Company, et al., Petitioners v.Grant Baker, et al., Respondents following the Exxon Valdez oil spill in Prince William Sound, Alaska.; Exxon’s arguments do not comport with the realities of the shipping industry in …

WebAug 3, 2011 · In Exxon Shipping Co. v. Baker, the Supreme Court’s most recent opinion on punitive damage awards, the Court declared that the real problem with punitive damage awards is their “stark unpredictability.” The Court abandoned all hope that common law jury instructions could produce predictable punitive damage awards. Instead, the Court ... WebFeb 27, 2008 · Brief for Petitioner Exxon Shipping Company et al. Brief for Respondent Grant Baker. Reply Brief for Petitioner Exxon Shipping Company et al. Amicus briefs. Brief for the United States Chamber of Commerce in Support of Petitioner. Brief for the Transportation Institute, the International Association of Independent Tanker Owners, the ...

Webthe realities of the modern shipping industry. Captain Mitchell Stoller graduated as valedicto-rian from the California Maritime Academy. Captain Stoller worked for Exxon Shipping Company between 1975 and 1988, first as a third mate from 1975 to 1977, then as a second mate from 1977 to 1979, then as a first mate from 1979 to 1984, and finally … WebJun 25, 2008 · June 25, 2008. The Supreme Court held that a $2.5 billion punitive damages award against Exxon was excessive as a matter of maritime common law, and limited the award to a 1:1 ratio of compensatory to punitive damages. In the ruling, the Court was equally divided on whether maritime law allows corporate liability for punitive damages …

WebMar 24, 1989 · The Exxon Valdez oil spill was a manmade disaster that occurred when Exxon Valdez, an oil tanker owned by the Exxon Shipping Company, spilled 11 million gallons of crude oil into Alaska’s Prince ...

WebEXXON SHIPPING CO. V. BAKER' The 2008 U.S. Supreme Court decision in Exxon Shipping Co. v. Baker is a landmark both with respect to the setting of punitive damages amounts and with respect to the use of statistical analysis of punitive damages awards to establish guidelines for punitive damages. The office of sustainable energy ntWebExxon Shipping Co., et al. v. Baker, 128 S.Ct. 2605, 2613 (2008). 2 . Against Hazelwood, the plaintiffs introduced evidence that he was "down[ing] at least five double vodkas in the waterfront bars of Valdez," that he was a recovering alcoholic who was in relapse, and that at the time of the spill his blood-alcohol level office of tafe coordination and deliveryWebIn Exxon Shipping Co. v. Baker, the U.S. Supreme Court recognized the right to recover punitive damages in admiralty cases and held that punitive damages in the case before it could not exceed the amount of the compensatory damages awarded plus the amount of settlements in related cases. In so holding, the Court reviewed many studies related to … office of sustainability \u0026 environmentExxon Shipping Co. v. Baker, 554 U.S. 471 (2008), was a case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States. The Court ruled in a 5-3 decision that the punitive damages awarded to the victims of the Exxon Valdez oil spill should be reduced from $2.5 billion to $500 million. The case was appealed from the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. The Ninth Circuit had also ruled that Exxon could be held liable for the reckless conduct of the ship's captain, Joseph J. Hazelwood, … myct smpWeb2008] EXXON SHIPPING CO. v. BAKER 143 II. BACKGROUND The Supreme Court’s decision in the noted case is grounded in maritime law. Maritime law is federal common law,15 but it is also judge- made in many respects.16 Theories that are well-grounded in land-based common law are not necessarily embraced by maritime decisions.17 For … office of tailored access operationsWebThe owner, petitioner Exxon Shipping Co. (now SeaRiver Maritime, Inc.), and its owner, petitioner Exxon Mobil Corp. (collectively, Exxon), have settled state and federal claims for environmental damage, with payments exceeding $1 billion, and this action by respondent Baker and others, including commercial fishermen and native Alaskans, was ... office of sustainability uscWeba punitive damages/compensatory damages maximum ratio of 1.0 in Exxon Shipping Co. v. Baker, which it viewed as an appropriate upper bound ratio for maritime oil spill cases.13 In her opinion that dissented in part, Justice Ginsburg hypothesized that the 1:1 ratio of punitive damages to compensatory damages might have broader applicability in myct store