Coltman v bibby tankers ltd 1987
WebColtman v Bibby tankers (1987) Purpose Approach - Classed a defective ship as equipment. R v Bentham (2005) Purpose Approach - A robber pretended he had a gun … WebJul 9, 2024 · Employment lawyers based in Clifton, Bristol, have researched the following cases dealing with the meaning of equipment, which it is hoped will be of interest. …
Coltman v bibby tankers ltd 1987
Did you know?
WebThe operation of this presumption is illustrated by the case of Coltman v Bibby Tankers Ltd (1987) 3 ALL ER, 1068. The case rested on the interpretation of section 1(3) of the Employer’s Liability (Defective Equipment) Act of 1969 which defined the word ‘equipment’ as including “any plant machinery, vehicles, aircraft and clothing”. WebOct 10, 2024 · Coltman v Bibby Tankers [1988] AC 276 In this case the Court of Appeal held that an injury sustained because of a defect in the hull of a ship was not actionable, not falling within the definition. ... Hunter and Others v Canary Wharf Ltd and Hunter and Others v London Docklands Corporation [1997] AC 655 Two joined appeals were heard together ...
WebThursday 3 December 1987. Coltman and Another (Administratrices of the Estate of Leo Thomas Mackenzie Coltman Deceased) (Appellant) Bibby Tankers Limited … WebLatimer v AEC Ltd [1953] AC 643 *McDermid v Nash Dredging Co. [1987] 2 All ER 878. Walker v Northumberland County Council [1995] 1 All ER 737 *Employers Liability (Defective Equipment) Act 1969, s.1. Coltman v Bibby Tankers [1987] 3 All ER 1068 *Knowles v Liverpool City Council [1993] 1 WLR 1428. Strategic Guidance
WebOct 10, 2024 · Coltman v Bibby Tankers [1988] AC 276 In this case the Court of Appeal held that an injury sustained because of a defect in the hull of a ship was not actionable, … WebFirst PlX71islled for tlle Prop) ietors 711e Moder)l Luov Review Ltd. by Steve)ls & So)ls Ltd of 11 New Fetter La)1e i)l tlle City of Lo)ldon 17zld /oi)lted in Creat
WebAug 7, 2016 · For example, in Coltman V Bibby Tankers when they had to interpret the word ‘equipment’. Secondly, it give flexibility and can fill in the gaps, so looks to the spirit …
WebCase: Coltman v Bibby Tankers [1988] AC 276 Health And Safety At Work: Back to 1898 Deans Court Chambers (Chambers of Craig Sephton QC) Personal Injury Law Journal … magazine zap clermontWebMay 19, 2006 · Coltman v. Bibby Tankers Ltd. (1987) 3 AIIER 1068, 1071(HL) [Employer's Liability (Defective Equipment) Act, 1969 S. 1(1)(3)]." 9. We have heard the rival submissions in the light of material placed before us and precedents relied upon. The assessee is engaged in the business of shipping. Besides owning ships it also chartered … magazine zitierenDec 3, 1987 · magazinfedernWebRe. agency workers see Heynike v 00222648 Ltd (formerly Birlec Ltd) [2024] EWHC 303 (QBD) ... In McDermid v Nash Dredging And Reclamation Co Ltd [1987] ... vehicle, aircraft and clothing. In Coltman v Bibby Tankers Ltd [1988] AC 276, a ship was held to fall under ‘plant and equipment’ under the Act. See also the Provision and Use of magazine zorgvisieWebo Davie v New Merton Board Mills [1959] AC 604 – A simple metal tool, called a drift. o Coltman v Bibby Tankers Ltd [1988] AC 276 - An employer who was charged for negligence under the Employer Liability Act (1969) was found guilty over a death of a man on a defected ship. Even though the word “ship” is not included in the definition of ... cottonhere.comWebBux v Slough Metals (1974) 1 All ER 262 Coltman v Bibby Tankers Ltd [1988] AC 276 Knowles v Liverpool City Council [1993] 1 WLR 1428. A Safe Place of Work: Foreseeability: See Latimer v AEC Ltd [1953] 2 QB 701 Control: See Wilsons & Clyde Coal Co Ltd v English [1938] AC 57. cotton heritage asiWebApr 12, 2016 · Coltman and Another v Bibby Tankers Ltd The; of 8 /8. Match case Limit results 1 per page. Author: kin-fung-ho. Post on 12-Apr-2016. 109 views. Category: Documents. 28 download. Report. Download; ... BIBBY FINANCIAL SERVICES V SKRATKE · BIBBY FINANCIAL SERVICES V SKRATKE Bibby Financial Services bola … magazine zentangle